Social skills are behaviours that in specific circumstances, predict significant social outcomes. Important social outcomes in a school context may include a) acceptance by peers, b) assessment of social skills by significant others (e.g., teachers), c) academic achievement, and d) other behaviour that are consistently correlated with the previous (Gresham, 1988; Gresham et al., 2001). These skills are context-related and enable the individual to complete social tasks competently (Little et al., 2017). Social skills enable successful adaptation and development of positive relationships with family, friends, and peers. They are essential in the educational and professional context, as well as in everyday life, as they facilitate the successful management of complex interactions and group dynamics (Moody & Laugeson, 2020; Vlachou et al., 2016).The adoption of appropriate social skills is considered crucial in the social development of students and their well-being. This is particularly relevant to inclusive education, where social skills development in students with special educational needs (SEN) is linked to academic attainment, social inclusion, and successful transition to adulthood. The willingness of teachers to tackle the difficulties in social skills development of SEN students, and to apply social development strategies, is seen as a key variable that affects the implementation of successful interventions at the school level (Beaumont et al., 2015; Vlachou et al., 2016; Vyas, 2022). Teachers need to take up an active role in supporting students to acquire the necessary social skills for successful interaction and development of social relationships. They need to foster a positive classroom climate, model appropriate behaviour, encourage cooperative learning, and explicitly teach social skills (Mansoori et al., 2013).Students with advanced social skills meet teacher expectations regarding classroom behaviour and climate and facilitate the teaching and learning process (Lane et al., 2012). In addition, students with more proficient interpersonal skills are less likely to experience conflicts with teachers and instead are more likely to have close relationships with them (Trang & Hansen, 2021). Also, it seems that at least in some school subjects, teachers base their assessment not only on academic skills but also on the student’s social skills (Gustavsen, 2017). Understanding teacher expectations related to student behaviour can contribute to more focused and efficient social skills interventions (Banković et al., 2021). Teachers’ perspective on the importance of distinct social skills is particularly valuable for social skills assessment. A contextual approach to the assessment of social skills requires not only considering the goals and motivation for social behaviour from the child’s perspective but also considering responses of others in their environment that may reinforce or discourage the social behaviour. Newly learned social skills need to be naturally reinforced to generalise in the child’s everyday environment. When others in the environment reinforce the application of a new social skill, regular use of that skill is more likely. As teachers, along with peers and parents, are one of the relevant sources of information, it is assumed that social skills which they identify as valuable will be naturally reinforced in the environment (Hupp et al., 2009).Lane et al. (2003, 2004, 2006, 2010) in a series of studies found that teachers and special educators value Cooperation skills and Self-Control more than Assertion. Most valued skills included following teachers’ directions, control of temper during conflicts with peers and adults, responding adequately to physical aggression of peers, getting along with people who are different and adequate use of leisure time. In general, teachers showed a proclivity for valuing skills that enable unhindered teaching and learning, emphasising agreement, harmony, and moderation. When looking at differences between special educators and regular teachers, they found that despite the equal perceived value of Self-Control and Assertion, regular teachers consider Cooperation as more valuable than special educators.

This study aims to determine which social skills are perceived as critical for classroom success by regular teachers of students with ASD in inclusive classrooms and special educators who teach in special schools.

Table 1 shows the percentage of special educators and teachers that rated the importance of a specific skill with 2 points (“critical”). The table lists the top 15 skills that were rated as critical by at least 30% of the participants, in at least one group of participants.

Looking at the distinct domains of social skills, it is evident that special educators and teachers most frequently regard critical social skills related to the Cooperation domain, such as ‘following teacher directions’ and ‘following classroom rules’, ‘completing tasks without bothering others’, as well as ‘participating appropriately in class’. In the Responsibility domain, both participant groups consider ‘students’ well behaved when unsupervised’ extremely important for success in school, while special educators (57.9%) are to some extent more inclined to agree with this, compared to teachers (45.5%). However, ‘accepting responsibility for their actions’ is very important for 36.4% of teachers, while only 12.3% of special educators consider this skill critical. When looking at Assertive skills, one-third, or approximately one-third of participants in both groups consider ‘saying when there is a problem’ and ‘asking for help from adults’ as key skills for student success. In the teachers’ group, similar results were observed for two skills in the Engagement domain (‘interacts well with other children’ and ‘participates in games or group activities’) and the Self-control domain (‘resolves disagreements with teachers calmly’ and ‘uses appropriate language when upset’), while special educators rate these skills as less valuable. The contrary is evident when looking at two Communication skills – ‘responding well when others start a conversation or activity’ and ‘making eye contact when talking’.

Table 1. Percentage of special educators and teachers that rated the skill as “critical.”

Table 2 shows the rank of subscales according to the total average importance rating of skills in one subscale (min. = 0, max. = 2). There is a consensus between the groups’ perceived value of the domains of social skills behaviours, associated with each subscale. Both special educators and teachers attributed the highest importance to Cooperation skills, followed by Responsibility and Self-control. Next, Engagement, Assertion, and Communication are considered as less important, while the Empathy domain is seen as least important. Although teachers in comparison to special educators attribute higher importance to all subscales (except Cooperation), the Mann–Whitney U test confirmed that ratings between groups differ significantly only in the Empathy domain (U = 664.00, Z = -2.376, p = 0.018).

Table 2. The rank of subscales by the importance of skills and differences in subscales rating between special educators and teachers

Table 3. Differences in importance rating of social skills between participants in lower and upper elementary grades

The results obtained using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to examine differences in the importance rating between individual subscales in both participant groups show that special educators consider skills in the Cooperation domain as significantly more important compared to skills in any other domain: Responsibility (Z = -5.678, p = 0.000), Self-control (Z = -5.131, p = 0.000), Engagement (Z = -5.973, p = 0.000), Assertiveness (Z = -5.934, p = 0.000), Communication (Z = -6.176, p = 0.000) and Empathy (Z = -6.082, p = 0.000). Further, skills comprised in the Responsibility domain are considered significantly more important than skills in the Communication domain (Z = -4.117, p = 0.000) and Empathy (Z = -4.001, p = 0.000). In addition, Self-control skills are regarded as significantly more important than Communication skills (Z = -3.130, p = 0.002) and Empathy (Z = -3.987, p = 0.000). A similar advantage was observed for Engagement skills compared to Communication (Z = -4.178, p = 0.000) and Empathy (Z = -3.202, p = 0.001). Teachers value Cooperation skills significantly more than Assertiveness skills (Z = -3.137, p = 0.002), Communication skills (Z = -3.139, p = 0.002), and Empathy (Z = -3.514, p = 0.000).

Responsibility skills are considered significantly more important only compared to the Empathy domain (Z = -3.028, p = 0.002). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to test the differences in ratings of assessed skill domains between participants teaching in upper and lower grades, within each sample group. Table 3 shows the average values of importance rating of each subscale by lower and upper elementary grade special educators and teachers, as well as the significance level of differences between those groups. Although values of arithmetic mean in all social skill domains are higher in the special educators group teaching upper grades, compared to their colleagues in lower grades (except in the Engagement domain), a statistically significant difference is found only in the Assertive domain (U = 263.500, Z = -2.096, p = 0.036). Between teachers in lower and upper grades, differences across the social skills domains did not reach statistical significance.

The goal of this study was to determine the perspectives of teachers and special educators regarding the importance of distinct social skills for successful functioning in the classroom and school environment. The results point out that both groups of participants attributed the highest value to skills in the domain of Cooperation, however, Responsibility and Self-Control skills are highly valued. When looking at both participant groups together, the results are in line with findings from previous studies, that utilised the former version of the instrument – The Social Skills Rating System, and with results from standardisation studies of the updated version (SSIS) used in this work (see Gresham & Elliott, 2008). In these studies, teachers and special educators highlight Cooperation skills and Self-Control as critical for student success in the classroom, while the Assertion domain is less valued (Lane et al., 2003, 2004, 2006, 2010, Meier et al., 2006). Similar results were found in a study of perceived value by high school teachers and special educators from high schools specialised for SEN students (Banković et al., 2021). Although participants in the study attributed somewhat higher value to Self-Control compared to Cooperation skills, differences were not statistically significant.

Both domains of skills are perceived as significantly more important than Assertion, which agrees with our results, at least when considering Cooperation, where we identified a statistically significant difference compared to Assertion. Partially different findings in the importance rating of social skills domains and the significance of differences may be due not merely to differences in educational level and setting (elementary vs high school), but also due to certain methodological differences. Namely, our results may reflect the global nature of teachers’ expectations, considering that teachers were instructed to rate the importance of social skills needed for any student in their class. In the study by Banković et al. (2021), participants rated the value of social skills for particular students, thus the findings were probably, at least partially based on specific behavioural characteristics of individual students with mild intellectual impairment.

When looking at distinct skills, we found partial overlap with findings from other studies. For instance, in one research (Lane et al., 2004) over half of the teachers in regular elementary schools consider Cooperation (‘paying attention to and following directions’, ‘appropriate use of leisure time’) and Self-Control (‘anger management in peer and adult relationships’, ‘getting along with others’ and ‘appropriate reaction to physical aggression’) skills as critical. On the other hand, none of the Assertion domain items were rated as critical by the majority of teachers. Similar results were noted in the study by Meier et al. (2006). Skills that are needed for undisrupted following of lessons, such as ‘paying attention to and following the teacher’s directions’, ‘following classroom rules’, ‘completing tasks without disturbing others’, and ‘adequate behaviour in the absence of direct supervision by teachers’ were perceived as critical by the majority, or close to the majority of teachers in our sample. Then again, between 21% and 37% of participants considered skills that are needed for appropriate relationships with peers and solving interpersonal conflicts as critical. In general, the noted value hierarchy of skills in our study, in view of broader domains, as well as in view of distinct skills, is in line with findings in earlier works, stating that teachers and special educators attribute critical value to skills related to good academic achievement, learning habits, and classroom behaviour as critical for student’s success in school; while less value is attributed to interpersonal and problem-solving skills (see review study by Lane et al., 2012).

However, unlike the above-mentioned studies that identify several skills considered as critical for classroom success by more than 50% of participants (e.g., seven in the study by Lane et al. (2004) or eleven by Meier et al. (2006)), results from our sample identify only three skills in the special educators group, and one skill in the teachers group rated as critical by just over 50% of participants. It is plausible that participants in our sample generally consider the social functioning of students as less valuable, compared to other aspects of school behaviour, such as academic engagement or cognitive skills related to academic success. This assumption, possibly a result of cultural differences and differences in the educational systems across countries, should be further examined in future research efforts. For example, in Hong Kong less focus is placed on Empathy and Communication skills, and much more on the development of academic skills (Cheung et al., 2017).

Because all participants in our sample work with students with ASD, the results can have implications for the necessary provision of support for these students when entering the school environment, both in mainstream and special education. Students with ASD require explicit teaching e.g., by social skills training interventions (Elliott & Gresham, 1991, as cited in Lane et al., 2012), particularly for skills in the domains of Cooperation, Responsibility, and Self-Control, which would optimize classroom success.

When creating interventions, consideration should be given to differences in the evaluation of certain domains of social skills between teachers and special educators. In our research, teachers gave slightly greater importance to all domains of skills, except for the domain of Cooperation, although the difference was not statistically significant (except for the domain of Empathy). Lane et al. (2004, 2010), for example, found that elementary school teachers perceive Cooperation skills as significantly more important for student success than special educators, which is inconsistent with our results. The explanation offered by the authors highlights the potential effect of the classroom size and students’ characteristics, as well as the respondents’ level of training. According to the authors, teachers are responsible for managing the behaviour of a larger number of students during the school day, while special educators have more experience in teaching students with behavioural problems and are better prepared to manage children's behaviour through professional training programs, and therefore are more confident when it comes to uncooperative students. In our opinion, it is possible that the class heterogeneity in terms of the types and severity of students’ disabilities, makes it more difficult to teach without interruptions than in regular classes, therefore special educators value this area of ​​skills relatively more than teachers. Thus, for example, attention problems, which are very common in the population of students attending special schools (Đorđević & Banković, 2014), negatively affect learning and task-oriented behaviour and reduce student achievement (Hughes & Kwok, 2006, as cited in DiPerna et al., 2017).

It seems that special educators who teach in upper elementary grades have somewhat higher expectations regarding the social functioning of students compared to those who teach in lower grades, especially in the domain of Assertion skills. These expectations may stem from the generally superior intellectual and socio-communicative abilities of older students. However, as information on the severity of disabilities, or the level of their socio-communication skills was not collected, this assumption should be confirmed or refuted by subsequent research exploring the perception of special educators who teach students with different degrees of disabilities and different levels of development of the mentioned skills. Certainly, the identification of changes in the expectations of special educators in relation to grade level highlights the potential need to include Assertion skills in the focus of social skills interventions as part of the preparation for transitions from lower to upper elementary grades (Lane et al., 2010).

Since previous research mostly used the former version of the instrument (Social Skills Rating System) (e.g., Lane et al., 2003, 2004, 2006, 2010, Meier et al., 2006), a full comparison to results obtained for individual subscales in this research cannot be applied. Even when the current version of the instrument, namely SSIS, was used, the results were not entirely comparable. For illustration, we find a similar hierarchy of social skills domains in the study by Frey et al., 2014, where the Cooperation domain importance rating had the highest (1.29), and the Empathy domain had the lowest (0.99) average value. However, this research assessed perceptions of preschool teachers, and not teachers and special educators in elementary schools.

Although, the Empathy domain is attributed with the lowest perceived value in both participant groups in our sample, the observed significant difference between teachers and special educators, where teachers attributed higher value to this domain, could be explained by the higher levels of social cognition characteristic for students in regular schools. Future research should examine factors that may potentially shape the perceived importance of certain social skills by teachers and special educators, such as the personal characteristics of students and the general level of challenging behaviour in the classroom. Certainly, given the inconsistency of the findings (when compared to results of other research), as well as the relatively small number of participants in our research, the results should be taken with a certain amount of caution.

Overall, the results of our study reveal more similarities than differences between teachers and special educators in terms of expectations regarding social skills critical for student success in the classroom. Therefore, we can conclude that similar skills would be needed for the successful adaptation of students in both regular and special education environments, but that certain differences in expectations (e.g., in Empathy or Assertion skills between special educators in lower and upper elementary grades) may have implications for student support. The presented results suggest that teachers and special educators emphasise social skills needed for successful teaching and learning, therefore prevention and treatment programs in the domain of social skills should be focused primarily on skills in the Cooperation domain.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This study is a result of the Erasmus + project "Inclusion through social skills for learners with autism and intellectual impairments" 2021-1-RS01-KA210-SCH-000032379.

This paper is based on the presentationSocial Skills Important for the Functioning in School: Teachers and Special Educators’ Perspective delivered at It's About People 2023: Social and Technological Development in Service of Security and Dignity, 11th Annual Conference of Europe’s Sciences and Arts Leaders and Scholars, held from March 10 to 17 2023.

Banković, S., Brojčin, B., Đorđević, M., Đurić-Zdravković, A. (2021). Značaj socijalnih veština za uspešno funkcionisanje učenika sa lakom intelektualnom ometenošću u školi – perspektiva nastavnika [The importance of social skills for successful functioning of students with mild intellectual disability in school – teacher perspective]. U I. Stojković, B. Dučić, K. Stanimirov (Ur.), Zbornikradova 11. međunarodnognaučnogskupaSpecijalnaedukacijairehabilitacijadanas (str. 433–438), Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.

Beaumont, R., Rotolone, C., & Sofronoff, K. (2015). The secret agent society social skills program for Children with high‐functioning autism spectrum disorders: A Comparison of two school variants. Psychology in the Schools, 52(4), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21831

Cheung, P. P., Siu, A. M., & Brown, T. (2017). Measuring social skills of children and adolescents in a Chinese population: Preliminary evidence on the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS-C). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.019

Csumitta, K. D., Stephan, C. M., LaQuaglia, R. I., Miller, E., & Lee, N. R. (2022). Updated profiles of everyday executive function in youth with Down syndrome using the BRIEF‐2. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 66(1–2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12879

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Cheng, W., Hart, S. C., & Bellinger, J. (2017, March 23). A cluster randomized trial of the Social Skills Improvement System-Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) in first grade. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000191

Đorđević, M., & Banković, S. (2014). Profil problema u ponašanju kod učenika sa lakom intelektualnom ometenošću i učenika tipičnog razvoja u odnosu na nivo usvojenosti nastavnih sadržaja [Profile of behavioural problems in students with mild intellectual disability and typically developing students in relation to adoption level of educational contents]. U B. Brojčin (Ur.), Zbornik radova ,,Problemi u ponašanju kod dece i mladih s intelektualnom ometenošću” (str. 87–110). Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.

Frey, J. R., Elliott, S. N., & Kaiser, A. P. (2014). Social skills intervention planning for preschoolers: Using the SSiS-Rating Scales to identify target behaviours valued by parents and teachers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413488415

Gresham, F. M. (1988). Social skills. In: J. C. Witt, S. N. Elliot, F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of behaviour therapy in education (pp. 523–546). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0905-5_20

Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system: Rating scales manual. NCS Pearson.

Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029010670030

Gustavsen, A. M. (2017). Longitudinal relationship between social skills and academic achievement in a gender perspective. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1411035. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1411035

Hupp, S. D. A., LeBlanc, M., Jewell, M. J. D., & Warnes, E. (2009): History and overview. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Social behaviour and skills in children (pp. 1–22). Springer.

Lane, K. L., Carter, E. W., Common, E., & Jordan, A. (2012). Teacher expectations for student performance: Lessons learned and implications for research and practice. In Classroom behaviour, contexts, and interventions. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0735-004X(2012)0000025008

Lane, K. L., Givner, C. C., & Pierson, M. R. (2004). Teacher expectations of student behaviour: Social skills necessary for success in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380020401

Lane, K. L., Pierson, M., R., & Givner, C. C. (2003). Teacher expectations of student behaviour: Which skills do elementary and secondary teachers deem necessary for success in the classroom? Education and Treatment of Children, 26(4), 413–430.

Lane, K. L., Pierson, M. R., Stang, K. K., & Carter, E. W. (2010). Teacher expectations of students’ classroom behaviour: Do expectations vary as a function of school risk? Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327464

Lane, K. L., Wehby, J. H., & Cooley, C. (2006). Teacher expectations of students’ classroom behaviour across the grade span: Which social skills are necessary for success? Exceptional Children, 72(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200202

Little, S. G., Swangler, J, & Akin-Little, A. (2017). Defining Social Skills. In: J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of social behaviour and skills in children (pp. 9–18). Springer.

Mansoori, H., Heydari, M. H., Nasrabadi, H. A. B., & Faramarzi, S. (2013). The role and station of the teacher in formation of the social skills in disabled students in an inclusive education program. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18), 30–38.

Meier, C. R., DiPerna, J. C., & Oster, M. M. (2006). Importance of social skills in the elementary grades. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 409–419.

Moody, C. T., & Laugeson, E. A. (2020). Social skills training in autism spectrum disorder across the lifespan. Psychiatric Clinics, 43(4), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2020.08.006

Rey, D., Neuhäuser, M. (2011). Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank test. In: Lovric, M. (Еd.), International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (pp. 1658–1659). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_616

Trang, K. T., & Hansen, D. M. (2021). The roles of teacher expectations and school composition on teacher–child relationship quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120902404

Vyas, D. P. (2022). Creating an inclusive environment in school. International Journal of Research in Special Education, 2(1), 12–14.

Vlachou, A., Stavroussi, P., & Didaskalou, E. (2016). Special teachers’ educational responses in supporting students with special educational needs (SEN) in the domain of social skills development. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 63(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1111305

The Law on Elementary Education, Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia No. 161/19 and 229/20 (2020).

The Law on Elementary Education, Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia, No. 55/2013, 101/2017, 10/2019, 27/2018 – and 129/2021 (2021). https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_osnovnom_obrazovanju_i_vaspitanju.html